Using doctest is nice, but it is not very good for large test suites.

The unittest module is another standard module that provides a much more powerful way to write tests and despite its name it can be used to write integration and acceptance tests just as well as unittests.

Simple use case of unittest

From the previous article you might be familiar with the extremely complex Python module that we wanted to test:

examples/python/dt/mymod_1.py


def is_anagram(a_word, b_word):
    return sorted(a_word) == sorted(b_word)

It has a single function called is_anagram that checks if two strings passed to it are anagrams of each other.

First tests

examples/python/dt/test_mymod_1.py

import unittest
from mymod_1 import is_anagram

class TestAnagram(unittest.TestCase):
    def test_anagram(self):
        self.assertTrue(  is_anagram("abc", "acb") )
        self.assertTrue(  is_anagram("silent", "listen") )
        self.assertFalse( is_anagram("one", "two") )

if __name__ == '__main__':
    unittest.main()

The infrastructure

Unittests usually go into a separate file which is usually called test_*. This naming is not required for the basic usage, but later we'll see that the unittest module can "autodiscover" the test file and then having the files named test_* is one way to let it do its job.

Besides, it makes it easier to the humans looking at your code to set the application code and the test code aside.

Inside the code we need to load the unittest module. We need to create a class that inherits from unittest.TestCase. Naming the class TestSomething is not required but that's another nice convention.

Lastly we need to create methods that start with test_*.

We might also need some helper methods that won't be called test_*.

Inside the test-methods we use the assertTrue and assertFalse methods inherited from unittest.TestCase to assert whether the function returns True or False as expected from it.

As opposed to the assert statement of Python, these assert... methods will not raise exceptions and thus even if some of them fail, the rest will still be executed. That way we can get the overall picture of our test and won't stop on the first failure.

The last piece of infrastructure is the conditional running of the main function. It is only used as convenience to make it easy to run the tests.

if __name__ == '__main__':
    unittest.main()

The actual tests

So far we talked only about the infrastructure of the tests. In order to actually execute out code, the AUT (Application Under Test) we need to load it as we would in the "real world". e.g. by from mymod_1 import is_anagram and then inside the assert.. methods we just call the function we would like to test. For example: is_anagram("abc", "acb")

Running the tests

As we included the condition running of the tests in the test-file itself we can run the test-file directly: python test_mymod_1.py

$ python test_mymod_1.py

.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

OK

The single dot . and the number 1 indicate that we had one test_* method in our file. It does not count the individual assertions.

The OK tells us that every assertion in every test_* method passed.

Dealing with failures

As in the previous article, here too we would like to see what happens if a test fails. In our case someone was not satisfied with single-word anagrams and expected to be able to have spaces in at least one of the "words". We test this by adding another test_* method to our file:

examples/python/dt/test_mymod_2.py

import unittest
from mymod_1 import is_anagram

class TestAnagram(unittest.TestCase):
    def test_anagram(self):
        self.assertTrue(  is_anagram("abc", "acb") )
        self.assertTrue(  is_anagram("silent", "listen") )
        self.assertFalse( is_anagram("one", "two") )

    def test_multiword_anagram(self):
        self.assertTrue( is_anagram("ana gram", "naga ram") )
        self.assertTrue( is_anagram("anagram", "nag a ram") )

if __name__ == '__main__':
    unittest.main()

Running this file we get the following output:

$ python test_mymod_2.py

.F
======================================================================
FAIL: test_multiword_anagram (__main__.TestAnagram)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test_mymod_2.py", line 12, in test_multiword_anagram
    self.assertTrue( is_anagram("anagram", "nag a ram") )
AssertionError: False is not true

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 0.000s

FAILED (failures=1)

Here we can see a single dot . indicating a single test_* method that had all its assertions passed and a single F that indicates the test_* method that failed at least one of its assertions.

The FAIL part indicates the test_* method that failed.

The Traceback provides detailed information about the actual failure.

Running individual test methods

If you encounter a failure in one of the tests in your test suite, you will usually want to fix the problem that generated that test-failure. For that you'll want to run the tests repeatedly, but when focusing on one part of the code and on a single test_* method, it might be a waste of time to keep running the whole test-suite. Luckily unittest allows us to run the test methods individually. for that we need to pass the name of the test-class and the name of the test-method on the command line: python test_mymod_2.py TestAnagram.test_anagram.

The output for the successful test method looks like this:

$ python test_mymod_2.py TestAnagram.test_anagram

.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

OK

Here you can see that there is only a single dot . indicating that only a single test-method was executed.

The output of the failing test method looks like this:

$ python test_mymod_2.py TestAnagram.test_multiword_anagram

F
======================================================================
FAIL: test_multiword_anagram (__main__.TestAnagram)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test_mymod_2.py", line 12, in test_multiword_anagram
    self.assertTrue( is_anagram("anagram", "nag a ram") )
AssertionError: False is not true

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

FAILED (failures=1)

Here you can see a single F and no dot . indicating that only a single failing test-method was executed.

Running tests without the conditional running

The last part of the test-files are actually not really necessary. We could eliminate the

if __name__ == '__main__':
    unittest.main()

and have the following:

examples/python/dt/test_mymod_3.py

import unittest
from mymod_1 import is_anagram

class TestAnagram(unittest.TestCase):
    def test_anagram(self):
        self.assertTrue(  is_anagram("abc", "acb") )
        self.assertTrue(  is_anagram("silent", "listen") )
        self.assertFalse( is_anagram("one", "two") )

    def test_multiword_anagram(self):
        self.assertTrue( is_anagram("ana gram", "naga ram") )
        self.assertTrue( is_anagram("anagram", "nag a ram") )

Then we need to load the unittest module on the command line as well. Like this:

python -m unittest test_mymod_3

The result would be the same.

We can also run the individual test-methods by providing the exact, dot-separated path on the command line: (test-file.test-class.test-method)

python -m unittest test_mymod_3.TestAnagram.test_multiword_anagram

Test discovery

Finally, as we named our test-files test_* we can also make use if the autodiscovery feature of the unittest module. We can run python -m unittest discover and let it find all the tests files.

In our case this will be a bit funny as we have 3 files in our directory with (almost) the same tests. That's because of the examples above. However this can also show that the discover feature runs all the 3 files.

The report actually does not indicate that there were 3 files only, that we have a total of 5 test-methods. 3 dots . indicating 3 methods that were successful. 2 F characters indicating that two of the methods failed. (Yes, I know, they are copies of each other.)

$ python -m unittest discover

..F.F
======================================================================
FAIL: test_multiword_anagram (test_mymod_2.TestAnagram)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".../examples/python/dt/test_mymod_2.py", line 12, in test_multiword_anagram
    self.assertTrue( is_anagram("anagram", "nag a ram") )
AssertionError: False is not true

======================================================================
FAIL: test_multiword_anagram (test_mymod_3.TestAnagram)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".../examples/python/dt/test_mymod_3.py", line 12, in test_multiword_anagram
    self.assertTrue( is_anagram("anagram", "nag a ram") )
AssertionError: False is not true

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 5 tests in 0.001s

FAILED (failures=2)

In Python 3 you don't even add the discover to the end. This will already start the discovery process:

$ python -m unittest 

Conclusion

In any case you can now write tests using the unittest module. You can run them and if something fails you can focus on the failing test instead of running the whole suite again and again.

BTW as you can see the test-methods are the smallest units the unittest module can operate on, so it is probably a good idea to keep them very short and focused on specific features.

Comments

That was awesome explanation about uninttest. Would like to know one thing, is there a possibility of collecting all failed test cases & rerunning ?